It's that time of the week again! Time to take your MP3 player and stuff it!...with a new episode of U62: The Targ!
Got a very busy show this week in Episode 5.10: Midnight Music. I offer up a lesson for the artistic types out there, I take a look at the growing intercontinental feud between TV networks, I reminisce about the old days, take a long hard look at the Internet dating scene, and end by wondering what Pixar did wrong in 2011.
It's time for my annual tradition going back all the way to when I first stared developing my online presence oh so many years ago. Oscar nominations were announced today, so that means it's time to roll out my Oscar picks!
I'm feeling kind of guilty looking forward to this year's Oscars when I still have to catch up on last year's Oscar winners. I've been saying for a whole year now that I'm going to kill a Sunday afternoon by heading down to the video store and renting The King's Speech and Black Swan. I've still got time...hopefully before this year's ceremony.
Now, for those who might be new here, I've always done my Oscar picks a little bit different. Best Director? Best Actor? Best Screenplay? Pfft! You're going to be flooded with those predictions in the media between now and when the big show is on TV on February 26. Instead, I tend to focus on some of the smaller awards that I tend to geek out over. And those two awards: Best Visual Effects and Best Original Song.
My Thoughts: Hugo has been getting lots of love for it's imaginative use of 3D effects. Real Steel has ass-kicking giant robots. But the one that everyone is raving about is Rise of the Planets of the Apes, where virtually all of the apes were done with performance capture animation.
My Predictions: Rise of the Planet of the Apes
Best Original Song
Hey! Thanks to YouTube, I can post the nominations! The nominees are:
My Thoughts: Wow. Only 2 nominations in this category this year? I have no idea how this category works. Help me Wikipedia...OK. Apparently, eligible songs are ranked on a scale from 6 to 10, and to get a nomination, you have to get higher than 8.5. And these are the only songs that scored higher than 8.5 this year. Bit of a surprise with The Muppets...everyone knew it would score at least one nomination, but everyone thought that one nomination would be the film's opener "Life's a Happy Song." Either way, everybody loved the songs in The Muppets...this is their category to lose.
My Prediction: Man or Muppet
Best Animated Film
Threw this one into the mix when the category was created 10 years ago because I do so love animated films. As I've blogged before, there was a time in my life when I'd run out to the theatre and see every animated film that came out, but I stopped doing that when every animated film became talking animals making pop culture references. Which talking animals will be honour this year? The nominees are:
My Thoughts: For the first time since this category's inception, Pixar doesn't get a nomination. That's what you get for making Cars 2! Oh, well. Pixar still gets some love, though, as their short film La Lunagot nominated for Best Animated Short Film. (La Luna made the rounds on the film festival circuit last year...it's going to be in front of Brave this summer.) As always, there's a couple of art house picks that have people scratching their heads. A Cat in Paris is a French animated film, about a little girl and her cat solving a mystery on a warm Paris evening, and Chico and Rita is a Spanish/UK co-production about two gifted musicians in the 1940s and 50s as they bounce around from Havana, New York, Vegas, and Paris as they try to achieve their dreams. There's some controversy that The Adventures of Tintindidn't get nominated, once again sparking debate as to whether performance capture counts as true animation. And Rango made the list as expected. I know Rango got a lot of love, both commercially and critically, but when I finally saw it I found it fairly typical and didn't see what all the fuss was about. But because of all that love, it's the frontrunner.
My Prediction: Rango
Best Picture
Well, enough of my hipster Oscar predictions, I guess I should do at least one mainstream one, so why not the biggest one of them all? I really have no idea how this category works anymore. It used to be just 5 nominations. Then, a couple years ago, they expanded it to 10 to try to include more mainstream films and less art house picks that no one had heard of. This year, they're trying a new system where a film has to get a certain number of points to qualify, and there'll be as many nominations as there needs to be. 9 nominees this year, and they are....
My Thoughts: Well, the whole point of doing this was to allow more mainstream films, and we can see that here. The Help was getting a lot of Oscar buzz when it became the sleeper hit of the end of summer. However, with the Golden Globes and all the various critics awards across the USA that tend to be the indicator, it seems to be coming down to Hugo and The Artist. And many are pointing out that The Artist was brought to North American shores by the Weinstein Company, who are using many of the same successful Oscar campaigning techniques that they used last year for The King's Speech.
My Prediction: The Artist
Sunday, January 22, 2012
It's that time of the week again! Time to take your MP3 player and stuff it!...with a new episode of U62: The Targ!
I feel like I need to apologize in advance for this week's episode, Episode 5.09: Flame War. See, we're having a by-election up here in Athabasca, and I take a large portion of this week's episode ranting about one of the issues that's very important to me: affordable housing. Once that's out of my system, I also share one of my favourite stories of the making of Star Trek IV, and ponder the meaning of George Lucas announcing his retirement.
As Facebook now allows for longer and longer status updates, I find the silly little blog entries I used to do are getting passed over for just simply posting it straight to social networking sites.
But, since I still want to keep this blog running, maybe I should post this stuff to the blog and then just share the links on all the social networking sites. Oh, Internet, why are you so big and complicated?
Anyway, the simple little entry I want to say today is happy birthday to DeForest Kelley, still best remembered as Dr. Leonard H. "Bones" McCoy on the original Star Trek. Kelley passed away in 1999, but were he still with us, he'd be 92 today.
I'm sure lots of folks will be rolling out "He's dead, Jim" and "I'm a doctor, not a ______" montages in tribute today, so instead, I wanted to put out there one of my favourite quotes from Bones:
"In this galaxy, there's a mathematical probability of three million Earth-type planets. And in all of the universe, three million million galaxies like this. And in all of that and perhaps more, only one of each of us. Don't destroy the one named Kirk."
Although, for your own inspirational purposes, I'd suggest replacing Capt. Kirk's name with your name.
And, thanks to YouTube, here's one of my favourite McCoy moments. It's McCoy's return to Enterprise from Star Trek: The Motion Picture. Once you get past the pure 70s cheese of what McCoy is wearing, it's just a great little character moment.
Time for a new week, that means it's time for a new episode of U62: The Targ!
Today, we break out Episode 5.08: Pound Pound Pound It Out, in which, after we struggle with what to talk about, we start chatting up the sad remnants of dying fads, ponder building new tourist attractions in our national parks, and ask the age old question: "What am I doing with my money this month: paying the rent, or buying new DVDs?"
As I've previously blogged, two of my favourite filmmakers were out with new films in 2011 that I never got around to seeing. So, of course, I went out with my Christmas money and bought those films on Blu-Ray a) to finally see them and b) so I wouldn't have any gaps in my collection. A week ago I saw the first of those two films. The filmmaker was Pixar, and that movie was Cars 2. The second one was Kevin Smith, and that film was Red State.
Being a Kevin Smith fanboy, I'd been tracking this one online for a while. He sat down and wrote it after Clerks 2. Hoped to make it his next film after Clerks 2, but his usual studio the Weinsteins chose to pass on it. "It's a bleak, unrelenting film with no redeemable characters and everyone dies at the end! I don't understand why they wouldn't want to make it," I heard Smith joke in his famous Q&A sessions. So Smith went off and made Zack and Miri Make a Porno (ignore the critics and the box office returns, it's a damn funny film) and Cop Out (listen to the critics and the box office returns because it's a God awful film) before deciding to go back to his indie beginnings and make Red State independently.
It was about a year ago when he premiered it at the Sundance film festival and announced that he'd be distributing it independently as well. Many thought his distribution method was unique. Rather than pass it off to a distributor and put it in thousands of theatres, he was going to take it personally from theatre to theatre, screen it, and then do one of his famous Q&A sessions afterwards. Many thought this was revolutionary, but I looked at that and went, "Hey! Didn't Tim Allen do that a couple of years ago?" And he did. Allen made his directorial debut a few years back, and he personally took it theatres and screened it. Only instead of a Q&A, he busted out some new stand-up material and did his stand-up show. So it was hardly revolutionary. And, for a director like Smith, with a very dedicated fanbase, it made a lot of sense.
Smith brought his Red State show to Edmonton back in August or September...I can't remember exactly when. All I remember is I couldn't get the time off work to go, so I knew I'd probably just have to buy it on Blu-Ray when it came out and kick back some evening and watch it. That kind of didn't bode well, though, because the only other Smith film I'd ever seen without seeing it in the theatre first was Jersey Girl and...well, I can't make the expected joke. You can tell I'm a dedicated Kevin Smith fanboy, because only the dedicated utter these words:
"Ya know, Jersey Girl's actually not that bad."
You can't deny though that Jersey Girl and Red State have similar origin stories. Both were touted by Smith as being efforts to break out of his safety zone and try something new for him. With Jersey Girl, he was wading in the shallow end...just out of his comfort zone, but able to retreat quickly would things go on. With Red State, though, he did a cannonball off the high dive.
So, let's take a look see, shall we?
Red State
Directed by Kevin Smith
Starring Michael Parks, John Goodman, Melissa Leo, Kerry Bishe, Kyle Gallner, Michale Angarano, Nicholas Braun, Ralph Garman, Stephen Root, and Kevin Pollack Backstory: Well, I pretty much covered that above, so no need to repeat myself
Plot: This is a tough plot to summarize briefly. Three teenagers go off into the woods one night to lose their virginity to a woman they met on the Internet, but it turns out to be a trap lain by a religious fundamentalist organization that's a borderline cult. Things quickly spiral out of control and our borderline cult is soon in the midst of an armed standoff with federal agents. The film could more accurately be described as a series of character portraits as this Hell on Earth starts to break out. There's the small town sheriff, played by Root, who gets all jittery because this incident could reveal some of his secrets. There's one of the eldest children in the cult, played by Bishe, who's only thoughts turn to saving the children when things start falling apart. There's the lead federal agent, played by Goodman, who desperately tries to do the right thing. There's our three teenagers who kicked off our story, wondering desperately if they'll make it out alive. And, the most talked about performance in the film, Michael Parks as our cult leader Abin Cooper, who is very much the face of evil in this film. What I Liked: Visually, this is nothing like Smith has done before. He'd always been reluctant to direct action sequences, citing his own inexperience, but for most of the action scenes in this film, he does a pretty good job. In fact, there was one camera shot that, while not Earth-shattering, was just out of Smith's norm enough to make my jaw drop. Make no mistake though, it is still a Kevin Smith film. There'll be a line of dialogue and the delivery of that line that'll make you smile and go, "Yup, that's Smith." As I said, everyone's raving about Parks' performance, and deservedly so, but I was rather impressed with Goodman as the flustered federal agent in over his head. Being largely familiar with Goodman's comedic work, I'd never seen him do something dramatic before, and he was good. And there were some wonderfully tense moments.
What I Didn't Like: Well, it's still a Smith film, and as such, it does get a little too talky for an action/thriller. As riving as Abin Cooper's sermon is, it does kind of bring the plot to a halt. Final Verdict: Despite its preachy moments, I found Red State to be a tight little action thriller. It was tense, it was scary, and it was enjoyable.
So, as I'm sure has become very obvious by now, I'm a big, big fan of Pixar. Love their films. However, this past summer, I skipped their latest film. The commercials just held no interest for me. It was the first time I'd missed a Pixar film in the theatre in...ever. I'd seen every Pixar film in the theatre! Except this one. However, with my pockets filled with Christmas money, I went out and I bought it on DVD. I mean, I also own every Pixar film on DVD, so I can't have a gap in my collection.
Tonight, I finally sat down to experience the mediocrity that is....
Cars 2
Directed by John Lasseter; Co-directed by Brad Lewis
Starring the voices of Larry the Cable Guy, Owen Wilson, Michael Caine, Emily Mortimer, Eddie Izzard, John Turturo, Jason Issacs, Thomas Kretschman, Tony Shalhoub, and Bruce Campbell
Backstory: So, when this film was first announced, the question that every Pixar geek had was, "Out of all the fantastic films that Pixar has made, why does Cars get a sequel?" That question is best answered by Yogurt from Spaceballs: "Merchandise!" Granted, while Cars was Pixar's lowest grossing and not-best-reviewed film, it was also Pixar's biggest hit ever...in terms of merchandise sales. And since merchandise sales are one of the biggest parts of a film's revenues these days, a sequel was pretty much assured. But hey, we were all cynical towards Toy Story 2 & 3, and they turned out to be good, so Cars 2 could be good...right? Plot: In the freakish nightmare world where cars rule and humans are nowhere to be seen, the fuel magnate Sir Miles Axelrod develops a new alternative fuel call Allinol, and to promote the usage of this fuel, holds a race known as the World Grand Prix. Of course, our hero from the first film, Lightening McQueen, is invited to race, and he brings along his best friend Mater the Tow Truck. Mater, simple country bumpkin that he is, has all kinds of delightful culture shock misunderstandings, which eventually causes him to be berated by McQueen. However, Mater is soon mistaken for an ace secret agent by two British spies, and is enlisted to help them in their latest adventure. Seems that a crime syndicate made of history's greatest lemons is out to sabotage the World Grand Prix. Can Mater and his two new spy buddies save the day? Will Mater reconcile with Lightening McQueen? And who will win the World Grand Prix?
What I Liked: Well, it is Pixar, so the animation is gorgeous. My current favourite composer, Michael Giacchino, did the score, and it's a great pseudo-James Bond score. John Turturo voices McQueen's chief rival, a Formula One racer named Francesco, and he is hilariously over the top.
What I Didn't Like: PREACHY. This film is very blunt with its messages. Look, I appreciated trying to whip a little wisdom at the kids, but it doesn't have to be this blunt. The plot is kind of muddled, as we cut back and forth between McQueen on the race and Mater in his spy adventures. Owen Wilson is really phoning it in this time out as the voice of McQueen. And, as always, the humour of Larry the Cable Guy is an acquired taste.
Final Verdict: Well, what can I say? Pixar's four films prior to this all had me in tears at the end. No tears were shed at the end of Cars 2. The typical Pixar effort just doesn't seem to be there this time out. It's just...a sequel.
2.5 Nibs
Now, I've got a busy weekend ahead, but hopefully I'll be able to sit down and watch my other new DVD. Another of my favourite filmmakers had a new film out in 2011 that I never got around to seeing, so hopefully I'll be able to find a few moments over the weekend to watch and review it as well. Keep your eyes on this blog for when I finally check out Kevin Smith's Red State.
So, before this whole crazy Christmas/New Years period came to a close, I knew I had to get out to the movies. So I figured it was time for a good ol' double feature day, which I did back on Monday!
First up, I wanted to check out the new Sherlock Holmes sequel. I liked the first one well enough, and I found the second one to be...well, as the ol' cliche goes, "If you liked the first one...."
Next up, I wanted to catch the latest Mission: Impossible. As I'd previously blogged, I'd been very curious to see this, because one of my favourite directors, Brad Bird (The Iron Giant, The Incredibles, Ratatouille) was making his live-action debut with this. And for his live-action debut, he did a stellar job.
Happy New Year! Welcome to 2012, and I can think of no better way to ring in the new year than with a brand new episode of U62: The Targ!
We start the new year with Episode 5.06: A Week Full of Thursdays. I discuss the pains of being recognized, I lament the end of Batman: The Brave and the Bold, and I spend my time dissecting the trailer for The Hobbit.
So, once a year, I decide to e-mail out a letter to friends and aquaintiances just to update them on what's going on in my life. Since e-mail address change and go defunct and all that, I decided to post it to the blog this year, in the hopes that maybe, some long lost friends who are curious as to what happened to me, may Google my name some night. Here's my 2011 letter.
Good day, ladies, gentlemen, and various other individuals I haven’t e-mailed in over a year.
‘Tis I, Mark Cappis, with my annual note updating you on all the occurrences in my life. Usually, I send this out at the start of December, to get snail mail addresses and weed out my Christmas card list. But, life got busy and I wound up putting this off for most of December. It’s too late now to be a Christmas letter, so I guess it’s a New Years letter. All for the best, really. I’ve always felt that New Years was a more universal and inclusive holiday.
Writing this letter reminds me of the classic fantasy comic book The Sandman. In one issue, a man comes up with the ultimate scheme to live forever. When Death comes to collect his soul, he’ll simply say, “No thanks. I’m not going.” Death, overhearing this conversation and being a cheeky character, decides to grant this wish for immortality. Death’s brother, Dreams, not having much of a life, decides to strike up a friendship with this newly immortal person, and they vow to meet every 100 years, have a drink, and catch-up.
So what I’m trying to say here is, it’s been a hundred years. Who’s buying this round?
What’s Going On In My Life
My life is still very much uneventful. You’ll still find me up in Athabasca, working at 94.1 the River. I’m still the wacky morning guy, and you can hear me on the air every morning from 6AM to noon. Back in April, I celebrated 5 years up in Athabasca, and I’m still loving every minute of it.
The job really showed me how important a radio station can be to a community. You may recall that back in May, Slave Lake was victim to some devastating wildfires that burned down a portion of the town, resulting in the entire town being evacuated. Athabasca became home to the largest evacuation centre. Every day, on the air, I’d provide daily updates on what was needed at the evacuation centre, and every day, the listeners would provide it in droves. It was a very busy couple of weeks, but really reminded me that this job does have certain great powers, and great responsibilities, to paraphrase an old comic book.
This year, I also ended my time with the Magnificent River Rats Festival, Athabasca’s Canada Day celebration and music festival. I spent two years as treasurer, and I was really starting to find the job very taxing. I’m proud of my work with the festival, and I’m sure it will be very successful in the years to come. But rather than kick back and relax, I quickly found something else to fill my time.
Like a lot of other facets of the entertainment industry, radio tends to be full time work for part time pay. I’ve spent my five years in Athabasca living on a very tight budget, and I had some cost-of-living increases over the past year that threw my budget out of whack. So, I finally had to break down and, like a lot of my radio brethren before me, get a second job. I now spend my evenings down at Buy-Low Foods keeping the produce section stocked. It’s created some interesting reactions from listeners who recognize me. One assumed I was starting some kind of Dirty Jobs segment on my show and wanted to know when I’d be coming down to her business. Another seemed genuinely angry that I have to work two jobs and threatened to call my radio boss and demand I get a raise. I never got a befuddled memo from my radio boss about that, so I’m guessing he never called.
That’s the main reason why this letter is so delayed. Between Christmas events that I was broadcasting live from, and working double shifts at the grocery store for the Christmas rush, I was run pretty ragged this December. But now, I’m looking forward to a quiet January and things settling back into some sense of normalcy.
Favourite Quote of the Year
“Didn’t you go to NAIT? Didn’t you run for president? Dude, your campaign was hilarious.” – An Edmonton Oilers PR exec, when the Oilers came to Athabasca for an event. Turns out he was taking some business courses at NAIT when I decided to...make an impression. Let this serve as a reminder that you never know when, where, and what you’ll be remembered for.
“How on Earth can I find you?” “Just make a wish. That seems to work.”
As always, my online footprint is massive, so if you ever want to catch up with me, a quick Google search will turn up all manner of options.
And that pretty much sums up my 2011. No runs, no hits, no errors, as my dear ol’ Dad would say. All in all though, I’m starting to find that Dr. Johnny Fever summed up the radio announcer lifestyle quite accurately on a rerun of WKRP: “Pushing 40, and still living like a college kid.” But when all is said and done, I can’t imagine doing anything else.
See you again in 100 years. Next time, you’re buying.
Well, today, we got our first official look at one of the more mysterious blockbusters coming in the summer of 2012, Prometheus.
Why is this film so mysterious? As we all know, in this day and age, everything is preqeuls, sequels, and remakes. So, 20th Century Fox eventually decided to make a prequel to their best-know horror/sci-fi franchise, Alien. The general concept was to tell the story of the "space jockey," the pilot of the downed ship that our brave humans discover in Alien where they eventually unleash the Alien.
People were ready to shrug this off as just another shameless cash-in for the franchise. But then, things got interesting. Fox was actually able to convince Ridley Scott to come on board and direct this. Scott, of course, director of such blockbusters as Gladiator, Kingdom of Heaven, Black Hawk Down, the recent Robin Hood and...the original Alien way back in 1979. This is Scott's return to the sci-fi genre even since he made the cult-classic Blade Runner way back in 1982. The Alien fanboys have longed for Scott to return to the universe he created, and Scott's involvement brought a new excitement to the project.
So, the development stage went on. The script was refined. And then, Scott and the writers and producers started saying that things had taken a turn. As they continued exploring the story and its possibilites, it evolved into something new. Scott went on record as saying that the film had changed so much that it was no longer an Alien prequel, but that the fans would be able "to see the strands of Alien's DNA." Adding to the confusion was that many Fox higher-ups and several of the cast members continued to refer to it as an Alien prequel.
And that's what makes this film so mysterious. What exactly is it about? Just how much of a connection is there to Alien? Yeah, there's been a spoiler-filled script review circling the Internet for months now, and I could go read it, but where's the fun in that?
The first trailer went online today, and the questions continue.
Well, one thing people seem to be agreeing on...based on the visual asthetics in the trailer, it at least takes place in the same sci-fi universe as Alien. Many have pointed out that the trailer itself seems to be an homage to the original trailer for Alien.
Needless to say, I am intrigued by Prometheus. The mystery that's been surrounding this film is starting to get to me. What little we see in the teaser does some intriguing...it's almost like Scott finally has the budget, or the special effects technology, to really open up the universe he created, rather than the minimalist approach he had with the original film.
It's gotta a pretty star-studded cast, too. Noomi Rapace, the original Swedish Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, is Dr. Elizabeth Shaw, an archeologist heading out to the stars to discover the origins of mankind. Charlize Theron is along as Meridith Vickers, a corporate figurehead, and Michael Fassbender, who was the young Magneto in X-Men: First Class, is David, the Alien stock character of the cold-hearted android.
I think I'll be seeing this this summer. It's been enough of a tease so far that I'm hooked.
How exactly does this fit in to the Alien universe? I guess will find out on June 8.
So. Let's talk about The Lord of the Rings. Truthfully, not much of a fan. Don't get me wrong, the movies are good, and I respect that it sparked this whole trend of "filming the unfilmable" that's getting such upcoming movies as John Carter.
But I've never really been able to get into them because of the books. I've tried many, many times in my short life to read the books, but I find them so boring. That's why I've avoided the extended editions of The Lord of the Rings. From what I gather, all they really did for the extended editions was put in all the exposition and back story that brings the plot to a halt in the books.
22 years ago -- Christmas 1989 -- I got this handsome boxed set of The Lord of the Rings, and just by looking at the spines on my bookshelf, you can see all my previous attempts to read the trilogy. The Fellowship of the Ring is well-worn, like it's been read a dozen times. The Two Towers is in pretty good shape, like it's been read once or twice. And The Return of the King is as pristine as the day I tore off the wrapping paper.
However, also in the boxed set is the prequel to The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit. The Hobbit is beat-up, dog-eared, slightly torn like it's been read a thousand times. And it has. Despite my distaste for The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit remains one of my favourite books. It's just such an easier read...it's nowhere near as dense. My fantasy-loving friends once told me that The Lord of the Rings is simply The Hobbit with every single footstep described in painstaking detail. I haven't read The Hobbit in a few years...I think I'm due to read it again.
So, then, like a lot of nerds, when The Lord of the Rings started making serious coin at the box office, we knew it was just a matter of time before they made The Hobbit in order to keep the franchise going. There was some legal stuff to sort out first...the movie rights to The Hobbit were owned by MGM, and The Lord of the Rings was owned by New Line. Eventually, they figured out the legal stuff and resolved to work together. Peter Jackson, director of the trilogy, was on board...as a producer.
To direct The Hobbit, Jackson selected Guillermo Del Toro, the director of the Hellboy films and fresh off the Oscar-winning fantasy epic Pan's Labrynth. The plan at the time was to make two films: the first one, a straight up adaptation of The Hobbit. The second one, they were going to pour through all the various appendicies and footnotes that J.R.R. Tolkien wrote and concoct an original story to fill in the gap between The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings.
However, MGM was going through some financial woes, and Del Toro got fed up just standing around, waiting for the bankruptcy thing to sort itself out. So, Del Toro quit the project. And Jackson said, "Well, I guess it's up to me," and decided to direct The Hobbit. Also around this time they tossed the original "bridge the gap" film idea...instead, they were just going to cut The Hobbit in two and make two movies.
Of course, we have some returning cast members from The Lord of the Rings. Sir Ian McKellan is back as Gandalf, Andy Serkis is back as Gollum, Hugo Weaving is back as the Elf king Elrond, and they even worked in some cameos for Elijah Wood as Frodo and Orlando Bloom as Legolas.
Our hero, Bilbo Baggins, will be played by Martin Freeman. This isn't the first time that Freeman has played a cult-classic literary character...he was also Arthur Dent in the film version of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, and on the new BBC production of Sherlock Holmes (you know...the one that's supervised by Steven Moffat of Doctor Who fame), he's Dr. Watson. He was also Tim Canturbury, the original British version of Jim Halperin, on the original British version of The Office.
The first film, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, hits theaters on December 14, 2012. The second film, The Hobbit: There and Back Again, comes out December 13, 2013.
And the first trailer just went online.
I do get a little goosebumpy watching this. It's truly nice to see a return to this cinematic world. And as I've always enjoyed The Hobbit, I'm more familiar with it.
I think it's time to re-read The Hobbit to get ready for this film. And who knows? It might even give me enough of a running start to finally tackle The Lord of the Rings.
So, if you went to see Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows over the weekend, you probably saw the latest trailer for the latest Batman film, The Dark Knight Rises.
The third and final in Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy hits theatres Summer 2012, and I like what I'm seeing so far. Part of me is really, really glad that they're ending this with a third film. Having grown up with Star Wars and Back to the Future, one thing I learned is that it's best to end a film franchise as a trilogy. Besides, last time a Batman film went to a fourth, we got & Robin, a name that still sends shudders down the spines of Batman geeks.
But what really gets me is how they're really playing up that this the last one in this particular tale of Batman. Shouldn't be too surprised, though. As they pointed out in a recent Cracked.com article, there really is only one reason why you'd want to use Bane in a Batman movie.
I think I blogged before that before that Bane was on my shortlist of villains I really wanted to see in this next Batman film. Bane fits in with Christopher Nolan's realistic take on Batman quite nicely, especially if they go with the animated series interpretation: a superstrong South American hitman brought in by the mob to settle the Batman problem once and for all.
And besides, Bane really needs to be done justice. One thing folks forget is that Bane is super-smart. In his first appearance, the legendary Knighfall storyline, he successfully determined Batman's true identity and set about to thoroughly destroy Batman. And it really looks like that's what we're going with in this film.
Still scratching my head trying to figure out how Catwoman figures into all this. But what Selina Kyle whispers into Bruce Wayne's ear has me intrigued. And with the references to Commissioner Gordon being a "war hero, but we're not at war," is really starting to make think that Gotham City has been lulled into a false sense of security. One thing that's already been confirmed is that this takes place 8 years after The Dark Knight. Who knows how kind the past 8 years have been to Batman?
I'm going to throw in the latest poster now, just so I have a kick-ass thumbnail when I post this to all the social networking sites I'll be plugging this blog entry on.
All in all, with all the references to this being "The final adventure" and "The legend ends," I'm starting to think that this might be the closest we'll get to a cinematic rendition of The Dark Knight Returns...Batman's final adventure before he retires, dies in action, and/or takes his war on crime to the next level.
How will things end for the Dark Knight? We'll find out on July 20.
Sorry I missed things last night, things got busy and all in my dayjob. But I'm back now with an all-new episode of U62: The Targ!
In Episode 5.05: Cold Hands, Cold Heart, I decide to vent some anger by complaining about the cutting of Christmas specials, the cancelling of my new favourite TV shows, and getting into a Twitter feud with a celebrity.
It's that time of year. The trailers for the big blockbusters of next summer are starting to roll out, and as we all know, sequels are still the name of the game. So let's take a look at a couple of the sequels coming out this summer. Let's start with the one I'm not so excited about.
Men in Black. Loved the first movie. I felt the second one was a tired retread. It's been 15 years since the first film (holy moly, has it been that long?) and 10 years since the second. Is it too late for a third? Well, we'll find out when Men in Black III hits theatres this May.
Men in Black III is known in Hollywood circles right now for being a very troubled production. They had to shut down production for a few months to work out some kinks in the script. Executive producer Steven Spielberg even brought in his Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull script doctors Jeff Nathanson and David Koepp to iron things out. So it's going to be interesting to see what kind of film comes out of this.
I already talked about executive producer Steven Spielberg coming back...also back as director is Barry Sonnenfeld. I've mentioned before that Sonnenfeld is a director due for a comeback. In the 1990s, he proved he could do blockbusters with Men in Black and The Addams Family films. He proved he could do character-based comedy with Get Shorty. But, he did make Wild Wild West, which kind of killed his big screen career. He's been biding his time with some "brilliant-but-cancelled" television, being responsible for some of my favourite short-lived TV shows, mainly the live-action version of The Tick and Pushing Daisies. So I'm kind of hoping that Men in Black III re-energizes his big screen career.
Not much is known yet about the plot...just that we find Agent J time traveling back to the 1960s to help out a young Agent K. Will Smith is back as Agent J, Tommy Lee Jones returns as Agent K, Josh Brolin plays the young Agent K, Emma Thompson plays the new MiB commander, Agent O, with Alice Eve playing the young Agent O.
Men in Black III hits theatres this May.
And now, let's get on to the sequel I am excited about...the second G.I. Joe film, G.I. Joe: Retaliation. I've blogged before that I enjoyed the first live-action G.I. Joe film. While it offered nothing new in the way of action films and there some glaring plot holes, my childhood nostalgia for the property blinded me to the flaws. And given the cliffhanger that the film ended on, I knew a sequel could be good.
I've already blogged about the new cast members and who's working behind the scenes, so I'll just provide a link rather than re-hash myself. (That would be this link right here. Clicky click!) All I can say is...wow. I love this trailer. Once again, my childhood nostalgia for the property is making me giggle. Unlike the Transformers film, I'm getting the feeling that they're trying to advance the story. I can hardly wait for this one.
So, with Hollywood trying to tell us that 3D is all the rage, and with remakes also being popular, it was just a matter of time before Hollywood went, "Hey! Rather than re-make these old films, let's just convert them to 3D and stick them back in theatres!" So, 2012 is going to kick off with a bunch of 3D re-releases of recent classics. I just wanted to take a moment to run through some of the trailers.
First up, Disney is giving us Beauty and the Beast: 3D. Following the success of Disney's 3D re-release of The Lion King, Disney announced that they're going to be converting and re-releasing four of their recent classic animated films. Well...2 Disney films and 2 Pixar films. The first one out of the gate is Beauty and the Beast. (The others are Finding Nemo, Monsters, Inc., and The Little Mermaid).
Weird thing about Beauty and the Beast is that this was supposed to be Disney's first 3D conversion. It was supposed to come out 2 years ago...way back in the spring of 2010. But for reasons never disclosed, it was postponed. Couldn't have been because of technical limitations...it's already played overseas! So Disney's been sitting on this for a while for some reason.
Anyway, Lion King 3D convinced them that they can pull this off, so they're finally releasing Beauty and the Beast 3D. It hits theatres on January 13.
I love the movies of James Cameron. Here's a guy that's dedicated to pushing the limits of filmmaking technology to realize his vision. In fact, we can thank him for 3D films for being all the rage, thanks to his last film, Avatar. When it became the #1 movie of all time, naturally folks would start thinking that 3D is here to stay.
Well, let's not forget, before Avatar became the #1 film of all time, the record was held by Titanic, also by James Cameron. I love the story of how Titanic came to be. Shipwrecks is Cameron's thing. He loves diving to them. And he always wanted to see the wreck of the Titanic. So one day he said, "Hey. I should make a movie about the Titanic. I can convince a movie studio that I need to film the wreck for the film, and get them to foot the bill." So, he walked into a Hollywood producer's office and said, "How's this? Romeo and Juliet on the Titanic." He came out with a blank cheque and the rest is history.
Not gonna lie...I like Titanic. I think it was the first film that used all of modern special effects to recreate a historical period. Like most of Cameron's films, I respect it for its technical achievments. I've blogged before that my completely arbirtary made-up tradition is I watch it every New Year's Day. Because hey, why not? That being said, though, a 3D conversion is not enough for me to go back to theatres to watch it.
Titanic 3D hits theatres on April 6, 2012, just in time for the 100th anniversary of the sinking.
And lastly, we come to one of the most beloved film franchises of all...but we're starting with its most reviled film. When 3D starting becoming big, of course George Lucas said, "Hey! I think I know what I'm going to do for the next special edition changes to the Star Wars films!" And he announced he'd be converting all 6 Star Wars films to 3D. He'd release one a year, starting in 2012. And he'd be starting with the first one in numerical order which means...we're starting with The Phantom Menace.
Look, I've said it before and I'll say it again. I seem to have become completely burnt out on Star Wars. 10, nay, 5 years ago, a trailer like this would have given me goosebumps. But now...nothing. I feel nothing towards this.
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace 3D hits theatres on February 12.
Now, that being said, I would kind of like to see this trailer in 3D. Not the whole film...just this trailer. Mainly because it evokes memories of the trailer for the Special Editions from back in 1997.
Wouldn't that trailer be fantastic to see in 3D? With the images in the TV in the middle of the screen being in 2D, and then the X-Wing flies out in 3D? Yeah...that would be awesome.
So I'd like to see the trailer in 3D...but not the movie.
It's Sunday! That means it's time for a new episode of U62: The Targ!
We're trying something brand new for Episode 5.04: Scarecrow's Christmas Mix Tape. In this super-sized episode, we take a look at some of my favourite Christmas songs to ring in the holiday season! It's full of music, stories, and Christmas cheer.
It's Sunday! That means it's time for a new episode of U62: The Targ!
In Episode 5.03: Bigger on the Inside, we offer on update on the Royal Alberta Museum, we bring back What's Wrong with Society, and we discuss the rumors of a Doctor Who movie!
